When can the whistle-blower’s identity be disclosed?

Under the PERA Force Laws, the identity of a whistle-blower is protected by strict confidentiality provisions. The law allows disclosure of this identity only with the written consent of the whistle-blower. This rule ensures that individuals who come forward with valuable information are not exposed to harassment, intimidation, or retaliation for their actions.

The provision acts as a cornerstone of the whistle-blower protection framework within PERA, emphasizing that disclosure is not permitted on verbal permission, media requests, or external pressure from other authorities. Only when the whistle-blower voluntarily provides written authorization can the Authority lawfully reveal their identity. This ensures complete transparency, fairness, and adherence to privacy standards.

This safeguard builds public trust in the PERA system and encourages more individuals to report misconduct without fear. By maintaining confidentiality unless written consent is provided, PERA upholds the integrity of its enforcement process and demonstrates its commitment to protecting those who act in good faith.

Moreover, unauthorized disclosure without written consent may amount to a breach of legal duty and can lead to disciplinary or legal consequences for the person responsible. The clause therefore not only protects the whistle-blower but also enforces accountability within the system.

In summary, a whistle-blower’s identity may be disclosed only with their explicit written consent, ensuring full respect for privacy, legal protection, and procedural fairness under the PERA Force Laws.