Under the PERA Force Laws, the Government retains the power to change the lead regulator when it deems such action necessary in the interest of expediency and public interest. This clause provides legal flexibility to ensure that regulatory functions remain... Read More
Under the PERA Force Laws, the Government retains the power to change the lead regulator when it deems such action necessary in the interest of expediency and public interest. This clause provides legal flexibility to ensure that regulatory functions remain effective and aligned with broader administrative priorities.
The phrase “expediency and public interest” refers to circumstances where the existing lead regulator may not be able to perform efficiently, or where changing the lead regulator would better serve citizens, industry, or enforcement objectives. For example, if a particular regulatory body has greater technical expertise or operational capacity to manage a specific domain, the Government can transfer lead regulatory responsibilities accordingly.
This mechanism ensures that governance remains dynamic and responsive rather than rigid. It prevents regulatory delays and promotes accountability by allowing timely adjustments to oversight structures. The provision strengthens the administrative adaptability of the PERA framework and ensures that regulatory leadership always serves the public’s welfare and national efficiency rather than bureaucratic convenience.
Discussion
Leave a Comment