Whose identity must remain confidential under Section 60 of the PERA Act?

According to Section 60 of the PERA Act, the identity of the whistle-blower must be kept strictly confidential. This section forms a cornerstone of the whistle-blower protection mechanism, ensuring that individuals who come forward with credible information about corruption, misconduct, or violations are safeguarded against retaliation, threats, or discrimination. The Authority is legally bound not to disclose any details that could reveal the whistle-blower’s identity to unauthorized persons.

This confidentiality clause exists to build trust and confidence in the PERA enforcement system. Without such protection, potential whistle-blowers might hesitate to report wrongdoing due to fear of reprisal or professional harm. By guaranteeing secrecy, Section 60 encourages honest and voluntary reporting, which is vital for maintaining transparency and accountability within the system.

The protection of whistle-blower identity also aligns with global best practices in governance and anti-corruption laws. It reflects the PERA Act’s broader aim to promote a safe and ethical reporting environment where truth-tellers are valued and protected. Breach of this confidentiality may result in disciplinary or legal action against the responsible party, emphasizing the seriousness of safeguarding the whistle-blower’s privacy.

In summary, Section 60 reinforces that the whistle-blower’s identity remains confidential under all circumstances, ensuring their safety, dignity, and continued cooperation in the pursuit of justice.