If an offender refuses to receive a notice personally, how is its validity proven under Section 40 of PERA Act 2024?

According to Section 40 of PERA Act 2024, if an offender refuses to receive a notice personally, the law provides an alternative method to prove the validity of the notice. In such cases, footage from a bodycam is used as legal evidence that the notice was delivered or attempted to be delivered. This ensures transparency and accountability in the enforcement process.

The use of bodycam footage confirms that proper legal procedures were followed and prevents disputes regarding notice delivery. Unlike signatures from witnesses, courier certification, or local proclamations, Section 40 explicitly recognizes bodycam evidence as a reliable and admissible method to validate the notice. This aligns with modern enforcement practices and strengthens the integrity of the PERA enforcement system.

By relying on bodycam footage, authorities can document the delivery attempt accurately, maintain accountability, and ensure that all procedural requirements under Section 40 are fully met. This mechanism helps uphold fairness and legality in enforcement actions.