When one body is designated as lead regulator, the secondary regulator:

Under the PERA Force Laws, when one regulatory body is officially designated as the lead regulator, the secondary regulator cannot take concurrent cognizance of the same matter. This means that only the lead regulator has the authority to investigate, enforce, or take action within that specific domain or case.

The rationale behind this rule is to avoid duplication, conflict, or overlapping jurisdiction among different regulators. When multiple authorities attempt to exercise concurrent powers over the same subject, it can lead to administrative confusion, legal disputes, and inefficiencies in enforcement. By clearly defining the lead regulator’s role, the PERA framework ensures that there is a single point of accountability and responsibility.

However, the secondary regulator may still provide support, share data, or cooperate through inter-regulatory coordination mechanisms if required by the lead regulator. The intent is not to diminish the importance of secondary regulators but to maintain coherent and streamlined enforcement procedures.