If the Fund runs short, who covers the deficit?

Under the PERA Force Laws, if the PERA Fund becomes insufficient to meet its lawful expenses or financial obligations, the Government is responsible for covering the deficit. This provision ensures that the functioning of the Authority and its enforcement activities are never disrupted due to financial constraints. The Government’s support guarantees the continuity of operations such as enforcement drives, administrative management, and reward or refund payments.

The PERA Fund, as established under the Act, is the primary source of financial resources for enforcement, cost recovery, and administrative functions. However, since enforcement activities often depend on variable income—such as fines, fees, and rents—temporary shortfalls may occur. To maintain stability, the law mandates that the Provincial Government must step in to meet any financial gap.

This arrangement highlights the Government’s role as the ultimate guarantor of the Authority’s operational sustainability. It also underscores the principle that the Authority functions under the financial and administrative umbrella of the Provincial Government, ensuring reliability and accountability in all monetary matters.

By providing for government funding in times of deficit, the PERA Force Laws safeguard the continuity of enforcement operations, employee payments, and infrastructure development. The provision reflects sound fiscal planning—balancing financial autonomy with governmental oversight.

In conclusion, under the PERA Force Laws, the Government is legally responsible for covering any deficit in the PERA Fund, ensuring uninterrupted enforcement and regulatory functioning across the province.