The Rise of Political Tribalism and Social Division

Summary of dawn article 

Tribal trap by saif ali khan babkhel

 published 1 may 2026

Introduction 

The article explains how society is becoming deeply distinguish because political groups are strongly attached to their own beliefs and reject opposing opinions. This “tribal trap” causes people to prioritize party loyalty over national progress and constructive discussion.

End of efficient political debates

Political debates have become more aggressive and dramatic rather than meaningful. Political parties now rely on loud commentators and emotional rhetoric instead of experienced leaders. Television talk shows often focus on insults, arguments, and even physical fights, while real political issues are ignored.

Dangerous outcome of political tribalism 

The article highlights several harmful behaviors caused by tribalism, including:

• Affective polarisation: strongly disliking political opponents.
• Motivated reasoning: accepting only information that supports one’s beliefs.
• Zero-sum thinking: believing one side’s gain is automatically the other side’s loss.
• Cult-like following: supporting leaders blindly instead of following political principles.

These behaviors increase division and worsens democratic values.

Why People Resort to Tribalism

According to the article, people often turn to tribalism because they feel threatened. Humans naturally defend their beliefs and identities. When political identity becomes personal, disagreement feels like a personal attack, leading to emotional and irrational reactions.

Role of Social Media and Media Sensationalism

Digital algorithms and social media create “echo chambers,” where people mostly interact with others who share the same opinions. This strengthens bias and reduces critical thinking. Mainstream media has also adopted sensationalism, making outrage and confrontation more common for higher viewership.

Impact on Democracy and Society

The article warns that constant conflict and political division damage civil discourse and national unity. Labelling opponents negatively for having different opinions goes against democratic values and prevents healthy discussion.

Solutions to the Problem

The writer suggests a multilayered solution:

• Improve parliamentary debate culture.
• Hold media should be accountable.
• Encourage critical thinking and respectful dialogue.
• Regulate misinformation online.
• Promote balanced and informed discussions.

Conclusion

The article concludes that democracy cannot succeed when tribal loyalty becomes more important than truth, respect, and national cohesion. Although the political environment appears deeply divided, the writer believes there is still hope for positive change through dialogue and mutual understanding.