To whom must the weapons seized under Section 53 be delivered?

Section 53 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) 1898 establishes the procedure regarding the seizure and subsequent handling of offensive weapons from an arrested person. Once the arresting officer takes possession of such weapons, the law clearly states that these items must be delivered to the Court or to the proper officer appointed to receive them. This ensures that all seized materials are properly recorded, safeguarded, and can be presented as evidence when required during judicial proceedings.

The purpose of this requirement is to prevent any misuse, loss, or tampering of seized weapons. The officer making the arrest is not allowed to keep these items indefinitely. Instead, after ensuring immediate safety and security, the officer must submit the weapons to the lawful authority—usually the Court or an officer specifically designated for custody of seized articles. This step upholds accountability and transparency in the criminal justice process.

By handing over the seized weapons to the appropriate authority, the law guarantees the integrity of evidence in criminal trials. It also helps in maintaining public trust in law enforcement, ensuring that every piece of evidence collected during an arrest is properly documented and controlled. Failure to comply with this requirement could lead to disciplinary actions against the concerned officer or even impact the strength of the prosecution’s case in court.

Key Facts:

• Relevant Law: Section 53 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) 1898


• Responsible Authority: Court or proper officer


• Purpose: To ensure safe custody and accountability of seized weapons.


• Procedure: Weapons seized during arrest must be promptly handed over.


• Legal Significance: Maintains integrity of evidence for trial.


• Accountability: Prevents misuse or loss of seized items by law enforcement.


• Core Principle: Transparency and procedural fairness in the handling of evidence.